Who knew I could hold a train of thought?
So I am in the process of reading Plato's theory of aesthetics and art and he explains why my thoughts of relativity is off.
It is not just comparison of one thing to another, because that shows no scale.
There must be a constant- an unchanging- in order to have a basis of point, then from there, multiples MUST exist. There is the ultimate( world of forms; the "omega" {excuse my language}, ) then those create the variations of comparison or the basis of the 'means'.
re-edited again on 3.14.10:
In this case, this proves the infiniteness of everything not in abstract thoughts but through mathematics. What was just stated is (simply) the x,y,z planes.
I will stop there for the time being- I am only reading my aesthetics book, I haven't fully delved into my 'Tao of Physics' yet or "The Philosophy of Time and Space" <-- the last one I have had for...too many years without opening, I intended to buy a recommended book about artistic symbology and psychology with the same title... or really really similar title. (shrugs,- destiny)
bye!

No comments:
Post a Comment